If you’re interviewing for a product management role at FAANG and other top companies like Anthropic, NVIDIA, and DoorDash, expect prioritization questions throughout your interview process.

Prioritization is a key part of being a PM, so interviewers want to see how you approach the task. You need to show that you can prioritize ruthlessly with a clear framework, evaluate and justify trade-offs, and commit to a decision based on user needs and business goals.

Prioritization questions can be tricky, but if you practice with a framework, you can approach them with confidence. So, let's step through our suggested technique for answering prioritization interview questions as well as an example to help you prepare for your interview.

Here’s an overview of what we will cover:

  1. What are prioritization and trade-off questions?
  2. How to answer prioritization questions
  3. Example prioritization question with answer
  4. Example prioritization questions
  5. Interview tips
  6. How to practice prioritization and trade-off questions
Click here to practice 1-on-1 with FAANG ex-interviewers

1. What are prioritization and trade-off questions?

Prioritization and trade-off questions often get used interchangeably, so let’s first clarify what we mean by the two terms.

Prioritization is a core product management skill and a large part of the job. There’s always more to do than people who can do them, so as a PM, you need to decide what to prioritize. To get to that decision, you need to analyze trade-offs, i.e., identify the downsides of your choices and why they are outweighed by the advantages.

Interviewers ask prioritization questions to evaluate your structured approach to prioritization, as well as your critical thinking and communication skills. “What the interviewer is really looking for is: do you start from the goal, can you make a decision, and can you say what the trade-off is?” says Ben (ex-Meta Sr. PM).

There are many different features a PM could prioritize on a given product, as well as different conclusions as to which projects are the most impactful. Your interviewers want you to single out your highest priorities using a process that includes a thorough investigation of the factors and trade-offs involved.

Some companies like DoorDash and NVIDIA have rounds that focus mainly on product prioritization. But most will weave them into product sense and product metrics/analytical thinking rounds. Some behavioral questions digging into your product experience will also likely require you to talk about how you’ve prioritized and made trade-offs in the past.

2. How to answer prioritization questions

When answering prioritization questions, you need to show that you take a structured approach to decision-making. The best way to do that is to find an overarching framework that you’re comfortable with and practice using it.

2.1 3-step Prioritization answer framework

In this section, we’ll walk through one approach recommended by one of our expert PM coaches, Ben (ex-Meta Sr. PM). It is based on Meta Head of Product Naomi’s framework “Understand, Identify, Execute”. 

prioritization answer framework

Understand, Identify, Execute

3-Step Prioritization Answer Framework 

Step 1. Understand the goal and the customer

Start by making sure you understand the product properly and agree with your interviewer on the specific user/s and goal or business objectives. 

Agreeing on the goals upfront is extremely important because your priorities will change depending on what you’re trying to achieve with the product.

Step 2. Identify the options and score each

Often, in a prioritization question, you’ll be given a list of features or projects to prioritize.

Before you start ranking the items on this list, you’d first need to determine whether the list contains the right features to begin with. That’s why Step 1 is crucial. You need to check the list against the goal, customer needs you’ve identified, and what you’re optimizing for.

After a quick check, identify the options you’ve validated and score each option. You can use the RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort) framework as a tool for measurement. We’ll walk you through how to use RICE in the next section.

Step 3. Execute (make the call and explain how you’d measure it)

Closing your answer with a ranking based solely on RICE framework scores won’t be enough. It just shows you’ve learned a framework and not how you think.

So once you’ve scored the features on the list, it’s time to make the call. Check the ranking against the goal you’ve agreed on, ask more clarifying questions if needed, and consider other factors like time dependencies and other risks.

Based on these factors, make your decision: “I’d do X, and here’s what we lose by not doing Y.”  You can structure your prioritization as a phased roadmap, and talk through the trade-offs of your decision.

2.2 RICE framework for scoring options

The RICE FRAMEWORK

Ben recommends using the RICE framework only as a tool, but not as an overarching answer structure to prioritization questions. "RICE only ranks a list you’ve already been given. It doesn’t tell you whether it’s the right list or what you’re optimising for," he says.

Using the framework and the simple formula that follows  allows you to give a value to the features, projects, or products you’re considering, in order to make a more informed decision. It also helps you lessen inherent bias when making your choice of what to prioritize.

Here’s what the framework looks like, and the formula to come up with the score:

  • Reach: how many customers this product or feature will affect in a given time period
  • Impact: the degree to which this product or feature will contribute to your goal
  • Confidence: how sure you are about the values you’ve chosen in this calculation
  • Effort: the overall time your team will invest in the project

To determine the RICE score, you assign a value to each of these factors, find the product of Reach, Impact, and Confidence, then divide that number by Effort.

(Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort = RICE score

For each of these components, the value you assign to it will vary according to the goals and parameters of the product you’re working on.

Let’s go over each component briefly:

RICE Framework

Reach

When determining Reach, you want to have an idea of the number of people that your initiative will affect. To find this, you could measure customers in a quarter, transactions in a month, site visitors in a year, etc.

Impact

The exact impact that a product or feature will have on a consumer is difficult to predict precisely. So instead of coming up with a specific number as you would in finding Reach, choose from a multiple-choice scale for Impact. Here is how you could set your scale:

  • 3: huge impact
  • 2: high impact
  • 1: medium impact
  • 0.5: low impact
  • 0.25: minimal impact

Confidence

The confidence value is designed to help remove bias and cut through blind enthusiasm. Here, you assign a percentage of confidence to the values you chose for Reach, Impact, and Effort. Confidence is measured as a percentage, so you could theoretically choose between 100 options for this value. To speed up the process, treat this as a multiple choice option as well:

  • 100% : high confidence
  • 80% : medium confidence
  • 50% : low confidence
  • <50% : zero confidence / complete guess

Effort

To find Effort, you must consider the total amount of time this product or feature will take, from planning to implementation and testing. This means taking into account the work from every branch of your team, including product, design, and engineering. 

Effort is measured in “person-months,” or the work that one team member can do in a month. Small projects may be better estimated in “person-weeks.” To keep your answer easy to follow, stick to one measurement (i.e., don’t use both person-months and person-weeks together).

Effort will depend on a number of factors and is difficult to pinpoint exactly. So go for a rough estimate, and round everything up to a whole number.

Coaches who contributed to this guide

Profile picture for Ben F.
Ben F.
Product manager, Manager of PMs
United Kingdom
5.0 (1 review)
2 clients (50% rebook rate)
Profile picture for Ben F.
Ben F.
Product manager
Manager of PMs
United Kingdom
5.0 (1 review)
2 clients (50% rebook rate)
Browse more coaches

3. Example prioritization question with answer

Now let’s look at a sample worked answer that uses the 3-step approach we recommended above.

Question:

You’re the PM for a brand new photo-editing mobile app. How would you prioritize these 3 projects: 

  • Project A: update the in-app messaging system
  • Project B: develop a corresponding desktop app
  • Project C: add a crop tool to the editing suite

Answer:

Step 1: Understand the goal 

Given that you’ve been informed you’re the PM for a brand new mobile app, the current business objective could be to drive new user acquisition and engagement. Let’s assume that you’ve run this by the interviewer, and they’ve encouraged you to focus on user engagement.

Step 2: Identify and score the options

Using RICE as a scoring tool, go through each project and assign a value based on the primary goal of user engagement.

Project A (in-app messaging system update)

Reach = 250 users / quarter

Let’s say the interviewer gave some general figures, and this is the number they gave based on the last quarter. Every user who sends messages in the app will be impacted by this change. 

Impact = 0.5

The interviewer has informed you that users who send messages appear to do so sporadically. They only use it to share edited photos with friends who also use the app, something that can be done through the share feature. 

Confidence = 80%

Reach score is concrete and data-backed, but impact is largely an estimated figure.

Effort = 1

Let’s say that there’s already a framework in place for the messaging update, so the timeline of Project A won’t take longer than one person-month. 

RICE score 

(250 x .5 x .8) / 1 = 100

Project B: develop a corresponding desktop app

Reach = 350

There’s no data to back up how many users will use the desktop version. Check with the interviewer how many early users the app has. Let’s say it’s around 700. Use a conservative estimate and assume that 50% (350) will use the desktop app. 

Impact = 3

This feature will have a huge impact on users who adopt the desktop version. 

Confidence = 50%

There’s no exact data for both reach and impact, so both figures you have are estimates, giving it a low confidence score.

Effort = 6

Designing an entire desktop app will require a much larger time investment from the whole team. A similar project in your past experience took six person-months to complete. Acknowledge to your interviewer that this is an imperfect comparison.

RICE score

(350 x 3 x .50) / 6 = 88

Project C: add a crop tool to the editing suite

Reach = 600

A cropping tool is simple and commonly used, so you can assume the majority of users will use it. Let’s round the Reach number to 600.

Impact = 2

A crop tool is a relatively small addition to the toolset rather than a complete overhaul. You can assume the impact wouldn’t be huge, so an impact score of 2 (high) looks about right.

Confidence = 80%

We do have a data-based value for Reach for the cropping tool, but not for Impact. So you can score Project C with 80% confidence.

Effort = 3

For Project C (cropping tool), let’s say that the interviewer has told you that the team’s previous time investment for adding new editing features was three person-months. So you can give Project C an Effort score of 3.

RICE score

(600 x 2 x .80) / 3 = 320

Step 3: Execute and make the call

Here’s a summary of the RICE score of the 3 options:

  • Project A (in-app messaging update): (250 x 0.5 x .80) / 1 = 100
  • Project B (desktop app): (350 x 3 x .50) / 6 = 88
  • Project C (crop tool): (600 x 2 x .80) / 3 = 320

So, if we only take the RICE score into account, we should prioritize Project C (cropping tool), then Project A (messaging update), and put Project B (desktop app) at the lowest priority. 

However, we know that estimations won’t be 100% accurate, given the limited information in an interview setting. Consider any other factors that should be taken into account, such as time-sensitive dependencies for other projects.

In this case, prioritizing the cropping tool makes sense, as the ability to crop photos in an editing app is a basic attribute that many users would expect to be able to access. The trade-offs to consider when prioritizing Project C would be that offering a crop tool as a free feature may lead fewer users to upgrade to a paid account. However, it would be riskier to withhold the feature, because it may cause users to migrate to different apps.

Project A (messaging update) and Project B (desktop app) have similar RICE scores, so you should initiate an investigation as to whether there are any other reasons to prioritize one over the other. 

Let’s imagine that the interviewer mentioned that a desktop application was an early promise they made to stakeholders when initially launching the product. In this case, it would make more sense to prioritize Project B over Project A, despite the order of their RICE scores.

So, in this context, we should prioritize the projects in this order: C, then B, then A. However, there is no single correct answer for prioritization questions. You may come to a different conclusion than we did, or use a different framework such as the Kano model. The interviewer wants to see that you have a method for making choices and trade-offs, and that you’re considering the most relevant factors.

Now let’s jump into some example questions to help you practice.

4. Example product prioritization interview questions (from FAANG+, AI labs)

Now that you’ve got a framework in mind, use it to practice some real interview questions that were asked in past interviews at big tech companies. 

Here is a list of prioritization questions that have been asked at Meta, Google, Amazon, DoorDash, Netflix, Anthropic, and NVIDIA.

Example prioritization interview questions

  • Imagine you’re a PM at a startup that works with big data from the NHL — what’s the first product you would ship?
  • How do you build a roadmap?
  • How do you prioritize what to build?
  • If you have projects A, B, C, how do you prioritize them?
  • How do you prioritize in your current role?
  • What are the biggest issues with [OpenTable, TaskRabbit]? Prioritize solving these issues.
  • What are the biggest post-booking challenges with [DoorDash, OpenTable]? Prioritize solving these issues.
  • How do you prioritize a backlog? 
  • How do you settle priorities when you have limited resources?
  • How would you find out what the biggest issue is with Airbnb, and how would you set out to fix it?
  • How would you improve the engagement on Spotify or the recommendation algorithm for Airbnb?
  • If you were PM for Claude Code, what would you prioritize in the next six months?
  • How would you prioritize resources when you have two important things to do but can't do them both?
  • What is your framework for deciding between user-centric vs. product stability and engineering-focused features in a product release?
  • How would you prioritize and manage multiple competing projects?

5. Interview tips

Here are a few more tips from our expert PM resource Ben (ex-Meta Sr. PM), on how to best approach product prioritization interviews:

5.1 Make sure you understand the question

Don’t just jump into using RICE when you hear the word ‘prioritize’. Instead, take the time to understand what the business is trying to achieve in the scenario. Ask clarifying questions, or state your assumptions and get your interviewer to agree before you proceed.

5.2 Always make a call

Walking your interviewer through a structured approach to prioritization and then ending with “It depends” as a recommendation won’t cut it. Make it a habit to end your answer with a concrete choice, and an awareness of trade-offs: “I’d do X, and here’s what we lose by not doing Y.” 

5.3 Don’t be afraid to say “I’m not sure”

Demonstrating that you understand that nothing is certain is important in some cases. In such instances, often the best answer is something like “I’m not sure, so I’d test it first”.

5.4 Prepare real stories of how you’ve prioritized in the past

Prioritization questions show up in behavioral interviews as well, so make sure you have stories that demonstrate your approach. 

Find stories about how you had to say no to something, or how you had to prevent something from happening, or a time when you won investment against other priorities. For each one, know the problem, your decision, who pushed back and what the impact was.

6. How to practice prioritization and trade-off questions

With a lot to cover, it’s best to take a systematic approach to make the most of your practice time. 

Below you’ll find links to free resources and four introductory steps that you can take to prepare for prioritization questions.

6.1 Study the company you're applying to

Get acquainted with the company you’ve applied to. In many cases, the product questions you’ll be presented with will be based on real-life cases the company is facing.

If you’re applying to a specific team, take the time to find out which products you’ll most likely be working with, based on the job description, and research them. Look up relevant press releases, product descriptions, product reviews, and other resources in order to discuss what’s most important to the role: the company’s product.

If you'd like to learn more about a specific company's PM interviews, then we'd encourage you to check out our guide for that company below :

6.2 Learn a consistent method for answering prioritization and trade-off questions

In this article, we’ve outlined a step-by-step method you can use to answer prioritization questions. There are other frameworks you can use, but the important thing is to find one you're comfortable using.

To practice, we encourage you to first memorize the basic steps of your chosen framework, and then try solving a couple of the sample questions on paper.

This will help you to understand the structure of a good answer. It's a good first step, BUT just knowing the method is not enough, as you also need to be able to apply the steps in interview conditions. 

6.3 Practice with yourself or with peers

In our experience, practicing by yourself is a great way to prepare for PM interviews. You can ask and answer questions out loud to help you get a feel for the different types of PM interview questions. Practicing by yourself will help you perfect your step-by-step approach for each question type. It also gives you time to correct your early mistakes.

However, by yourself you can’t simulate thinking on your feet or the pressure of performing in front of a stranger. Plus, there are no unexpected follow-up questions and no feedback. That’s why many candidates try to practice with friends or peers.

If you have friends or peers who can do mock interviews with you, that's an option worth trying. It’s free, but be warned, you may come up against the following problems:

  • It’s hard to know if the feedback you get is accurate
  • They’re unlikely to have insider knowledge of interviews at your target company
  • On peer platforms, people often waste your time by not showing up

For those reasons, many candidates skip peer mock interviews and go straight to mock interviews with an expert. 

6.4 Practice with experienced PM interviewers

In our experience, practicing real interviews with experts who can give you company-specific feedback makes a huge difference.

Find a product manager interview coach so you can:

  • Test yourself under real interview conditions
  • Get accurate feedback from a real expert
  • Build your confidence
  • Get company-specific insights
  • Learn how to tell the right stories, better.
  • Save time by focusing your preparation

Landing a job at a big tech company often results in a $50,000 per year or more increase in total compensation. In our experience, three or four coaching sessions worth ~$500 make a significant difference in your ability to land the job. That’s an ROI of 100x!

Click here to book product manager mock interviews with experienced PM interviewers.